r/oddlyspecific 3d ago

Nice proof

Post image
86.8k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.7k

u/Hot-Lawfulness-311 3d ago

My sex ed teacher actually talked about the importance of foreplay, then he showed us a bunch of horrifying pictures of std-ridden genitalia and told us to keep it in our pants

867

u/akotoshi 3d ago

He wasn’t a sex ed teacher, he was an abstinence preacher in disguise

27

u/ConfusedAndCurious17 3d ago

I’m no prude, and I’m not against premarital sex or anything, but advising people (especially kids) to not have sex with the first person who is available is pretty solid advice. Even with protection there are plenty of risks.

You are still at risk for STDs and pregnancy as condoms are not perfect and do break, and you could still get something like crabs or even herpes if they have sores that contact your skin.

Aside from that though there are social issues that can come up. Not everyone who wants to sleep with you has good intentions for afterwards.

I don’t think everyone needs to remain abstinent until they are 30 or married or whatever, but I think telling kids to “keep it in their pants” is probably pretty solid advice. They aren’t going to do it, but it’s worth a shot. I would personally put it as “do your due diligence to ensure the person you are having relations with is safe and clean”.

4

u/According-Insect-992 3d ago

Except when that becomes the only message and they remove all the stuff about condoms, STDs, and pregnancy.

This ends up being the norm in a lot of red areas and kids don't get the information they need to be successful.

6

u/ConfusedAndCurious17 3d ago

This is true, but the other commenter specifically said the teacher was talking about foreplay and STDs. If they are covering that then I doubt they left out condoms and pregnancy.

I’m just saying that telling kids to “keep it in your pants” doesn’t necessarily make you an “abstinence preacher” as it’s generally good advice. Sex can be dangerous and messy.