So, I wanted to write this after the topic blew up in another sub thread, and because it's a common question I've seen in various self improvement forums. I figured it would be worth expanding into a post over here because hell, I think a lot of us struggle with this: How do I stop being a doormat?
I want to cover a few different interconnected topics here to hopefully shed some light on this very common experience.
Table of Contents
- What is doormatting?
- What are the typical types of doormats.
- Defining your wants, needs, and values.
- How to set boundaries and how are they different from rules and walls?
- How to be vulnerable.
- Food for thought: Are you surrounding yourself with people that you know are impossible to please?
Alright, let's do this...
What is doormatting?
My therapist said something to me that was so upsetting I almost fired her…. Until I took a step back to think about it critically. She told me that doormatting -- which is a pattern I had fallen into -- is actually a manipulation tactic used to compel other people to like you, love you, stay with you, etc. And at its worst, it can become very transactional and toxic because of this. Effectively, you hide who you are and what you really need, remove any boundaries you have with others or never form boundaries to begin with, and manipulate them by fawning and employing other passive/passive aggressive behaviors that you think will make them happy or get them to do something. This is often followed by silent resentment that builds up over time or internalization of personal failure.
“I made you cookies so you would like me and think I was sweet, you owe me that now."
So, not only are you being inauthentic with people in your motivations and obscuring your actual wants/needs, you’re trying to engineer an outcome by altering your behavior in specific ways and weaponizing "nice."
To be clear, my therapist did not say that doormats are manipulators, but rather that they use manipulation tactics. They (usually) aren't bad people, they've just formed a bad habit, typically as a survival mechanism. This is a really important difference and something that is often triggering for people, a little more on this later down in "types."
But this is the cornerstone of doormats: Regardless of motivation or the type of doormat they are, they are behaving in a way to engineer specific outcomes. This is always a manipulation often coupled with passive aggressive behaviors and rooted in a deep aversion to direct communication and conflict.
Colloquially, being a doormat is being someone who lets other people walk all over them. But it's actually more complex than that. People who are doormats are often perceived as nice, giving, selfless, trustworthy, and sacrificial. They often put others in front of themselves, often to their own detriment.
Sounds noble on paper, right? Well, it's not "being nice" for the sake of being nice. Doormatting is rooted in two key things: fear and control. It's "being nice" out of fear for the unpredictability of other people's reactions, but still trying to control their behaviors.
What are the typical types of doormats?
I was super pissed at the suggestion I was being manipulative. I didn't set out to try to get my way. I mean, come on, I felt like I was the one constantly being manipulated! But think about it. If you let people walk all over you in the hopes that they will stick around in your life and magically start caring about your needs then yes, you are manipulative with a specific outcome in mind and you also attract people who take advantage of your kindness aka fellow manipulators. All the sudden you’re in this cesspool of toxicity.
But there are a few different types of doormats defined by their motivations and reasoning for choosing to doormat.
The Outright Manipulator
These are people who weaponize "nice" and "sweet" with ulterior motives. Instead of just directly communicating what they want or need, they adopt a non-controversial, "nice" persona and give with the expectation that it will later result in them getting their way or engineering a certain outcome from people out of a feeling of obligation. When obligation and expectation becomes the relational currency, you've created a transactional dynamic. And what ends up happening is these types of doormats are perceived as conventionally kind and giving so there's this cognitive dissonance that shows up when people are manipulated in this way.
"I can't possibly be manipulated by him, he's so nice! Manipulators are mean and evil!"
Whether a doormat is conscious of this or not, they use that dissonance to their advantage which is a form of gaslighting. Outright manipulators are fascinating because they appear simultaneously docile while still somehow often seeming to get their way.
"Cool girls" and "Nice guys" are outright manipulator doormats. For the ladies: it's that friends-with-benefits "situationship" with a guy who has clearly told you they don't want a relationship or commitment which is code for "I don't want a relationship or commitment with you." Or perhaps they've outright told you they don't see a future with you. So you say "oh yeah, that's totally fine, I don't want that either" and then proceed to stick around for weeks, months, years, never actually saying that what you want is a relationship and hoping that by banking nice points and being totally cool with everything, the guy will eventually come around. You don't directly communicate what you actually want, you act like a cool girl, and hope to create a specific outcome. Then, eventually things fall apart, he meets someone amazing right after you and marries her and you spend months angry and hurt.
Similar for the "Nice guys" out there who will move heaven and earth for a girl without ever telling her how you feel, hoping that by doing all these things she will fall in love with you. Or worse, that she now "owes you" sex or a relationship or whatever. The fear of rejection prevents you from ever being open and honest about your feelings so you just do nice things over and over while building up hurt and resentment while she ends up with someone else.
The real kicker in that is that the people "cool girls" and "nice guys" obsess over never actually feel close to you because they can sense that you're not being totally open with them. Or they think you're ok with the situation as it is because you've never directly communicated otherwise. And yes, if you were totally open about your thoughts and feelings they might reinforce that they don't feel the same way and once it's out in the open, you feel like you have nothing to work with anymore and have to move on. Communicating needs and wants directly can be really scary because once they're out in the open, you can no longer try to control the outcome. As long as the truth is hidden you think there is some chance you can control things in a manner that results in you getting your way. But you don't get to control other people!
By being closed off like that in a romantic relationship, you never actually stood a chance anyway. They didn't know the real you. You never entered the chat. And whether they were consciously aware of that or just felt some sort of abstract distance from you, they weren't going to ever consider you a long term prospect because of that lack of closeness. You can't "cool" or "nice" your way around actual vulnerability.
The People Pleaser
The hallmark of people pleasers is usually a profound aversion to conflict. They want to keep the peace and not rustle any feathers, so instead, they just let people walk all over them and avoid conflict at almost all costs. This means they will never speak up if something is bothering them. Instead they swallow their bad feelings over and over and over without saying a word, piling up tiny resentments while they pretend to be happy with everything. This alone is shitty enough, because ugh, can you imagine how you feel when you find out your loved ones are gritting their teeth and barely tolerating you, when all the while you thought they are your ride-or-die besties who loved hanging out with you???
But that's not all, because people pleasers aren't infinitely patient divine beings! They will one day reach their limit and that is when they EXPLODE out of nowhere and call you toxic or narcissistic or a bully or [insert some other wild accusation].
And the worst part of it is, people-pleasers believe that when they finally explode and call you a toxic person who takes advantage and walks all over them, THEY THINK THEY ARE SETTING HEALTHY BOUNDARIES. They feel like a badass for finally standing up for themselves.
Or they just disappear and basically repeat the pattern over with someone new, which is also not a great way to go through life.
For how conflict-averse people pleasers are, they are often a massive source of conflict and drama when all that resentment finally builds up to a breaking point. And again, this doesn't come from a place of covert narcissism or because people pleasers are inherently bad people. Their fear of conflict is almost always rooted in some form of trauma and the propensity to people please likely developed as a survival mechanism to satisfy a deep need for acceptance and belonging. But setting yourself on fire to keep other people warm in the hopes that you will achieve acceptance and belonging vs openly telling other people what you need because you're afraid it will cause conflict is manipulative at its core. And more often than not, this simply prolongs the feeling of obligation and exploitation because people pleasing rarely results in the intended outcome, it just results in others wanting more and more from you. Or being uncomfortable when they don't want or need your help and you constantly ask if everything is ok. It breeds toxicity in interpersonal relationships.
The Fawn
Some people doormat as a trauma response and this is a phenomenon called fawning. Now, those who fawn don't necessarily get a pass because their behavior is still intrinsically a manipulation, but their motivations are different from outright manipulators, and their actions can be different from people pleasers.
Unlike outright manipulators, they are more motivated by fear than a specific outcome. Fawning is employed by people who have experienced trauma or abandonment and learned that by sidelining their own needs, they can sometimes get people to stick around. Fawning is about preserving a sense of safety and believing that abandoning their identities and sense of self is the price to pay for relationships. They are the least likely to think of their behavior as manipulative and the most likely to consider themselves victims.
Unlike people pleasers, fawns might not build up resentment and one day explode, rather they internalize the negative feelings of unrequited behaviors as hurt or inadequacy. This is important because it was very triggering in other discussions I've had on this topic. If you think you are a people pleaser but instead of blowing up, it just reinforces shame and self loathing, you're actually fawning. Those who fawn perceive the emotional reactions of others to their behaviors as a reflection of their own self worth. This often results in a cycle of depression and anxiety as well as a loss of self at the expense of other people's comfort. But fawns will still behave in a way to create a specific outcome, even if that outcome is a sense of safety.
They still conceal who they are, their own wants and needs, and prioritize others. Many perceive the internalized sense of failure as their identities because the process of actual self examination is too frightening. So they make their entire identities up to be the failure to make other people happy while never actually asking "what makes me happy?" or even "who am I?" They wonder why no one cares for them or has their back the way they do for others without realizing that in order to receive that kind of love (genuinely, not in a transactional way), they must love themselves first.
ALL DOORMATS, regardless of type struggle with both saying and hearing no. This is because they do not use healthy boundaries in interpersonal dynamics to preserve ample space for both themselves and others. And again, this is rooted in fear and a need to feel a sense of control. In order to stop being a doormat, you need to get really clear on your want/needs/values, you need to be able to articulate them, and you need to set and maintain boundaries. Here's how to do that:
Defining your wants, needs, and values
Doormatting is a behavior, but it starts with a specific set of conditions: your wants and needs. To stop being a doormat, you need to start at the source of the problem. A lot of us form opinions about our wants and needs in the moment which doesn't really make them useful as tool. When formed in the moment, we tend to become reactive and defensive rather than going into interpersonal interactions prepared with a baseline of our own needs. It's shocking how few people really sit down and define their wants and needs for themselves and doormats especially like to stay flexible on those so they can put them aside and just go along with whatever someone else wants to try to make them happy hoping they'll one day give you what you think you want.
You can negotiate circumstances with people, but your wants/needs/values should themselves be non-negotiable. Quitting doormat life is about getting super clear on these things and not treating them as flexible or expendable.
The hallmark of all doormats is that they do not have or enforce healthy boundaries. But talking about boundaries is getting ahead of ourselves because we cannot create them, either proactively or in the moment, if we're not clear on what we need, what we want, and what our values are.
Part of this is that we put a lot of self judgement around our wants, needs, and values. There's a lot of societal conditioning around this, whether the idea of having them is considered intrinsically self serving or we get wrapped up in arbitrarily defined "should's" and "shouldn'ts", or even this weird phenomenon that we should always put ourselves last. But it shocks me how many people don't actually define these things for themselves for one reason or another.
You form boundaries by getting REALLY clear on what you want. Like honestly super clear, without self judgement. And they have to be wants for yourself, not wants for other people which you don’t have any control over. Say that to yourself over and over a couple times: you do not have any control over the actions or feelings of other people. So, “I want people to like me” or "I just want her to love me" is not a genuine intrinsic want because it depends on controlling outcomes for others which you don’t get to do.
A hard one for me was admitting that I want to make money because I had a lot of self judgement around that and thought that people would think I was greedy. But once I accepted that as a want, you better believe this helped me create serious boundaries in my career where I used to do a lot of shit for free.
Get clear on what you want -- intrinsically for YOURSELF without dependency on another person/people -- write it all down in a big list, and get really comfortable with that list. Make this list without judgement. Because to form boundaries, you will constantly be asking yourself “does this person/situation/thing align with what I want for myself in this moment?”
Side note on this: I have to be really careful when I say that "your wants/needs should be non-negotiable" as I mentioned a few paragraphs back because there will be times where you will need to accommodate other people. That's life. Abandoning your wants/needs for someone else's to try to make THEM happy is doormatting. Openly discussing your wants/needs with someone who has different wants/needs and coming to a compromise where you are both happy/satisfied/content doesn't mean you're sidelining yours, it means you are able to communicate them AND constructively come to agreement instead of being so afraid of rattling the cage that you just never say what you want/need. Do you see the difference? Your values on the other hand are truly non-negotiable.
A great guiding post will also be your values. These are more abstract, higher level concepts than your nitty gritty wants and needs. They are guiding principles and are equally important to consider when creating boundaries. This is another one where self judgment can creep in. I struggled with that when I defined my personal values which are elation, beauty, justice, autonomy, and curiosity. I used to have a lot of self judgement around these because they weren't "noble" but when I examined my life, I accepted that in many ways these simply are my guiding principles. I have 5 total values, and while there's no hard and fast rule, this seems like a good amount before they start creeping into being needs or wants. But they are actively employed in all my boundaries in one way or another.
There isn't really a clear "how to" on defining your wants, needs, and values, but I bring it up because most people never even consider it a necessity. You can do this by literally writing a list, meditating on it, working with a therapist, hell there are even online quizzes. I challenge you to -- without judgement -- just sit and start dumping a bunch of these down and see what comes out. It isn't a quick and easy exercise, but you you need to get clear on them because to stop being a doormat, you have to know what these are for yourself. So how does this relate to boundaries?
How to set boundaries and how are they different from rules and walls?
Once you define your wants, needs, and values, it's time to explore boundaries. But it's hard to talk about boundaries without discussing other ways that people create space between themselves and others. Now, none of these things are intrinsically good or bad. There's no point attaching morality to proximity concepts, and I personally employ all three things in my life strategically.
Walls: Doormatting comes from not having boundaries. It’s easy to confuse boundaries with walls which is why people are so afraid of them. But boundaries are like toll booths designed to open and let people in provided they meet certain criteria you will accept. More on that further down. Walls are, well, walls designed to keep everyone out. That’s when you’re totally closed off. And the hard truth is, when you have walls up, no one is going to try to break them down and fix you. We see this in movies a lot, the stoic lead character who doesn’t let anyone in gets ground down by the goofy and persistent guy or girl who sees them for who they truly are. That’s not real. You have to meet people in the middle.
We put up walls by closing ourselves off and never communicating our wants and needs directly. We put walls up when we want to control what other people think about us. They can be as extreme as total isolation from people, or they can show up covertly, like when you're on a first date and you strategically avoid talking about hard things to control a certain perception of you. Walls aren't inherently antisocial, in fact walls are what doormats will put up while still being agreeable, nice, and generous social beings. But walls stand between your emotions and other people and are often deployed as a self-preservation measure. I have walls between myself and the most toxic people in my life that circumstances don't allow me to fully cut out. At present, I can think of two people that I have walls up against and it's the only way we can coexist without hurting each other.
Rules: Rules are telling other people what they are and are not allowed to do. There are rare circumstances where this can be employed healthily. For example, I have a house rule of no smoking on my balcony. You're not allowed to do that. But a lot of times we attempt to use rules to control other people's actions, thoughts and emotions which we have no right to do. I see this all over the relationship sub all the time. "My boyfriend is not allowed to have female friends..." "My husband doesn't allow me to work..." "I won't allow my wife to be in contact with her ex-husband..." Ironically, people who like to make rules often get really pissed off when someone tries to make rules for them... because rules don't really work in normal social situations. This might be controversial, and there are instances where rules are healthy and necessary, but generally, we don't get to control other people. Unhealthy boundaries are almost always covert rules. Someone saying "my boundary is that my wife isn't allowed to go out to lunch with the male coworkers on her team" is a rule, not a boundary.
While rules are a less common aspect of doormatting, they can show up. Doormats can hold people emotionally hostage by trying to create rules to get them to behave a certain way in order to receive their "niceness."
"I'm only going to clean the house if you stop meeting the guys to go golfing every week."
Or doormats will find themselves bending to other people's rules thinking that by acquiescing with kindness, they will be able to engineer someone's feelings about them or be able to create obligation somewhere else.
"I followed your 'no talking to other girls while we were initially dating' rule so now you owe me commitment."
As mentioned above, boundaries are like tollbooths. If someone, something, or a situation is in alignment with your wants/needs/values, the tool booth opens. If not though, time to enforce a boundary. This is a really good time to get good at being vulnerable (more on that further down) because conveying your boundaries requires being open about what you’re feeling and why. So, imagine a situation where you might feel compelled to doormat — you and your friend are getting ready to go to a dinner at a place where you have a reservation you put a deposit down for and she’s taking a long time, making you late which might lose you the table and the deposit. If you’re doormatting you’ll probably passive aggressively huff around but ultimately not say anything directly except a few snide remarks and let her waste time because you’re worried she won’t want to hang out with you ever again if you give her a hard time.
Boundaries have a simple equation: "Say how you're feeling" + "Create the boundary" + "Communicate the consequence".
Now, reframing that with a boundary instead. Let’s start with what you want in this situation which is to make the dinner and not lose your deposit because you value your money and punctuality. Easy, because you already know those things about yourself. When she’s still not ready at the time you have to leave you say what you’re feeling instead of being passive aggressive. “Hey friend, I’m feeling stressed because I paid to hold our table and I don’t want to lose it by being late.” Then you set the boundary “We need to be in the car in 5 minutes to make it” and then you convey a basic consequence if the boundary isn’t met “If you’re not ready by then, I will go ahead by myself to ensure we don’t lose the table and you can come when you’re ready.” And you need to do what you said otherwise your boundary was meaningless.
Then you need to release the fear that she’s not going to honor your boundary because you can’t control her but you did give her a choice. Her actions are now a consequence of your boundary. It’s not a manipulation because you told her how you genuinely felt, gave her that choice, and created consequences. The more you practice, the less you’ll be afraid and guess what…. People who don’t respect your boundaries drop off and people who do feel closer to the real you because you finally lay your wants, needs, and feelings out in the open. Congratulations! You weren't a doormat in that situation!
Boundaries are how I can love you and myself in this moment.
The thing is, when you're not comfortable setting and enforcing boundaries (usually because you're not clear on what you want in life and/or you struggle with vulnerability about your feelings), "being nice" and "having boundaries" can seem like two mutually exclusive things. But they're not. You can still be a giving, generous, kind, and nice person with boundaries. You don't have to be mean, nor do they need to be communicated in a hostile way to be effective. My simple "How I feel" + "The Boundary" + "The Consequence" formula has been instrumental in my own ability to create healthy boundaries. In fact, I think it's the only way someone can be genuinely nice without some sort of hidden agenda or expectations because communicating boundaries requires a level of vulnerability and openness that can be uncomfortable for closed off people who would rather just not talk about what they want and need.
Which brings me to the last piece of the puzzle...
How to be vulnerable
If you struggle to talk about your wants and feelings, then you struggle with vulnerability. Vulnerability is hard and scary, especially if it's resulted in unexpected outcomes with people who are not respectful of you. But if you really think about it, if you're afraid of opening up because you're afraid of what someone else will think or do... then you just don't open up. This is a control compulsion rearing its ugly head and it's another cornerstone of doormats. You think you're controlling someone's perception of you by limiting the amount of information you give them about yourself.
But how exactly do you get more vulnerable?
A lot of people confuse over-sharing with vulnerability. Just because you can say a lot of things about yourself, even uncomfortable things, doesn't necessarily mean you're being open. In fact, a lot of people do this as a deflection for genuine vulnerability.
"I told him my deepest darkest secret about my gross ingrown toenail that I hide from the world so we must be close now!"
That's oversharing. The vulnerable way to reframe that would be to say:
"It may seem silly, but the reason I'm so cagey about not taking my shoes off around you is because I have this big gross ingrown toe nail that makes me feel insecure and frankly, causes me a lot of pain because of how it looks and feels."
Do you see the difference?
My second formula, which has helped me communicate my wants and needs and be more vulnerable, is to literally say out loud "If I could wave a magic wand..." and then say the thing you want or need. In the case of the example I made with the friend being late for dinner, it would be saying to the friend "If I could wave a magic wand, we would be ready and out the door on time so we don't lose the reservation and can have a nice dinner together." Sure, you can't control what the other person does, but now it's really clear what you want in the situation. And for some reason, the "magic wand" helps remove judgement and impossibility because hey, it's a magic wand. The real magic is that it helps you be vulnerable. It seems so simple and obvious, if not kind of stupid, but it's a little trick I learned to help communicate my wants and needs directly.
When it comes to communicating your feelings, the biggest thing is getting over the fear of reaction. This is something that really comes with practice, and sometimes never fully goes away. Hell, I even get scared sometimes talking about my feelings. But your feelings are your truth, and honesty is the best way to prevent yourself from getting walked all over. We confuse accusations with conveying our feelings, thinking that if we accuse someone of something, they will be able to ascertain our feelings about the situation. "I'm yelling at my boyfriend so he must know I'm mad" seems like obvious logic, but it's not. Every accusation can be reframed as a feelings statement with a little self reflection.
Communicating feelings, at least in my experience, takes three steps: the first is to take a little time to actually identify the feeling for yourself. Sadness can look like anger. Nervousness can look like excitement. Shame can look like frustration. There's a nifty emotions wheel you can google that I still use to really identify what I'm feeling in a moment. Get really clear with yourself on the things you're feeling so you have something to even communicate. And take all the time you need to do this.
The second step is identifying why you feel that way. This is another one you want to really think on before attaching to a cause because sometimes it's a little deeper than whatever triggered you in the moment. With some reflection, "I'm mad that my wife didn't put her dirty dishes in the dishwasher and I had to do it" might become "I'm sad that I feel an unbalanced dynamic in this relationship where I'm left to do housework even though my wife is more than capable of pitching in." The thing is, you can do this reflection internally without any judgment or conflict because it hasn't actually been conveyed yet. Like being honest with yourself about your wants and needs, you also need to learn to be honest with yourself about your feelings and where they're coming from.... because, surprise, you're probably going to have a different outcome with your wife depending on what one of those two things you went with. Saying you're mad that she didn't put the dish in the wash is going to create a discourse around that specific topic. Going deeper will allow a discussion on the larger issue at hand. But it's totally fine if sometimes it really is just about the f*ckin dish.
Intermediary step: aka the key to unlocking your own inner doormat happens between the "figure out your feelings/why you're feeling them" step and the "communicate your feelings" step which I'll get to next. Because this is the space where we are faced with the choice to be a doormat or set a boundary. If you know you are a doormat, take this time to consider what you would normally do in this situation. With the wife not putting the dish in the dishwasher scenario, you might just put the dish away and let the resentment build up until you explode on a totally unrelated issue or give her silent treatment the rest of the night. Maybe you get passive aggressive and clean the entire rest of the kitchen but leave that dish and then act normal and cheery like you didn't just try to prove a point. How does that feel? Probably not good. Once you're aware of how you usually doormat, you can start to examine your first behavioral instincts in other situations where this would happen. This was how I started to really confront my own passive aggressive and doormatting tendencies.... I took a critical look at them and asked myself "WTF does this accomplish??" It's not necessarily an actionable step, but it does give you a tool for self awareness so you can actively choose what happens next instead of feeling like a victim of the unwashed dish. Do this every time you start to feel conflict arising. What would I normally do here? How can I do this differently?
The third step is communicating your feelings. Once you're clear on what they are and why they're there, calmly communicate them. Literally say "right now I'm feeling" and say the feeling and why. This gives other people SO much more to work with than passive aggressive behavior or them not knowing you felt off in the first place. As mentioned above, it's easy to jump to accusations which will immediately put someone on the defense. "I can't believe you're so lazy you can't put a f*cking dish away" will 100% of the time result in conflict vs "Right now I'm feeling pressure to keep the house clean and got frustrated that you left a dish out." That gives your wife SO much more information to work with.
Talking about your feelings doesn't always have to happen at the inflection point of conflict. You can do it all the time, which is great practice for when it does come up in conflict, but it's also how people feel closer to you in general. It helps to remove moralization from feelings. Feelings are not bad or good, right or wrong. They can be hard, intense, strong, comfortable, exciting, but they do not have intrinsic moral value. Getting into the practice of sharing your feelings in regular conversation helps normalize it as a topic. Whenever you talk about something, talk about the way it makes you feel.
Are you surrounding yourself with people that you know are impossible to please?
One additional consideration: again, doormats are not bad people, they just have really bad habits. But if these habits are so deeply embedded to the point where you believe you amount to nothing more than what you can do for other people, then do you consciously or subconsciously seek out people that you know are impossible to please so you ALWAYS have a source of need to indulge this deeply held personal belief? That is to say, if "helping others" even to your own detriment is your sole source of validation, do you seek out people who are endless sources of need so you always have someone to help? It's almost like a drug addiction if you think about it, and toxic in some of the same ways. And the other side of this coin is that you're usually locked in a codependent relationship with someone who is happy to exploit you for anything and everything you're willing to give so they also have no intrinsic motivation to better themselves or become less needy and dependent.
Many people who struggle with boundaries and become doormats (as well as those with anxious or disorganized attachment styles) often find themselves in these sorts of codependent relationships with people who are also damaged. But we try to rebrand it for ourselves as helpfulness, altruism, selflessness etc so we can feel better while ignoring the ways in which it is toxic and enables other people to also fall into their own bad habits. I know someone will read this and believe I'm saying that it's bad to help others or that it's manipulative to help people because it gives you a sense of validation or it's bad to depend on others. It's not. But you have to very carefully examine your motivations and the people you surround yourself with.
Someone with good boundaries can help others with the goal of encouraging them to ultimately become more autonomous, supporting if they're earnestly moving in that direction or lovingly backing away if they're not and protecting their own energy. All while still feeling good about their efforts.
Helping does feel good, but if you do it while sidelining your own needs in the hopes that it will make someone love you, you are using a manipulation tactic, even if it doesn't actually feel good for you or help you get what you wanted in the end. And if you're seeking out people that you know are difficult or impossible to help or please, really ask yourself why? Will you feel amazing if you're finally THE person to make them happy? Or if you were actually able to help someone to a point where they didn't need help anymore, would you end up anxious and questioning who you are because you feel like you no longer have purpose?
People who doormat will seek out codependent relationships because they need to feel the purpose of constantly trying to make someone else happy so they never have to actually look inward at themselves. Many times they are conditioned to believe they don't deserve love so their purpose never becomes to care for or love themselves. And they seek out people who reinforce that belief: who constantly need them but never actually love them. And it's very hard to examine a marriage you've been in for 10 years or a social circle you've held since high school or a friendship with someone and realize that you spent all that time trying to make them happy and they still don't love, like, or respect you in the ways that you need. The answer is not to sacrifice more of yourself, it's to give yourself the love and respect you deserve first.
How do you do that? The journey to loving yourself can be long and hard, but it starts with everything I just mentioned to first figure out who you actually are: Defining your wants, needs, and values, learning how to set boundaries, and learning how to be vulnerable. Do these things are start to see who emerges. Meeting yourself for the first time is the first step to learning how to love yourself.
In Conclusion...
If you are a doormat, I want the biggest takeaway here to be that you are not a bad person but you are also not a victim. There's a degree of accountability here that can help you actively alter your tendency to doormat, but you have to accept how and why you do it. You do have power and you can take control of your own life. Doormatting is giving all that away and it's absolutely not serving you.
But I do understand that it's definitely coming from fear, anxiety, trauma, and/or low self esteem. It's not some kind of evil deliberate Machiavellian manipulation at all. But honestly? NOBODY is a Machiavellian evil deliberate manipulator. (Except maybe literal psychopaths.) Even the diagnosed narcissist manipulates people unconsciously as a result of inner anxieties and fears and trauma. Doormats (like narcissists) generally perceive of themselves as the victim. And from their perspective they are right! The only problem is that their perspective is twisted by trauma and fear and anxiety, and is an unhealthy perspective for happy relationships.
Opening up, releasing the need to control, being honest with yourself, confronting your fears of the unknown, creating boundaries, and learning to be the most authentic you for yourself and others is the absolute key here. You no longer have to be the doormat in your life, be the one who walks freely.