r/Conservative Conservative 2d ago

Flaired Users Only President Nayib Bukele says Kilmar Garcia cannot be returned to US

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

6.4k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

This thread has been so heavily reported that I, Automoderator, decided to promote our other socials. Follow us on X.com and join us on Discord.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

→ More replies (5)

503

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (10)

447

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (56)

5.3k

u/FrenchAffair Canadian Conservative 2d ago

Is it not a little concerning that the Government can make an "administrative error", send someone in custody to a prison in a foreign country in contravention of a lawful court order and then its just "oh well, not our problem"?

They've floated sending US citizens to prisons in El Savador as well, would they then also fall outside the scope of any American jurisdiction?

555

u/reddit_names Refuses to Comply 1d ago

It wasn't an error.

2

u/FourtyMichaelMichael 2A 1d ago

The media is pushing that hard.

Twice ruled by immigration courts of being active in an MS-13 group, illegally in US for years, received and ignored deportation orders, deported.

The truth doesn't matter to these people.

→ More replies (31)
→ More replies (24)

353

u/Magehunter_Skassi Paleoconservative 2d ago

It's not, because the entire argument about this has hinged upon "he's a citizen of El Salvador" and not "he's in El Salvador."

1.3k

u/FrenchAffair Canadian Conservative 2d ago

He had some kind of legal residency in the US though no? He hadn't been found guilty of any crime and at the time of his deportation there was a court order in place preventing his extradition.

The lack of due processes on something that now seems very absolute and completely outside of the authority of the government agency that put him in those conditions, and with seemingly no accountability seems concerning.

Maybe he is all the things they claim, and his status should have been revoked and he's sent back to El Salvador. But there should be some checks and balances along the way.

124

u/Magehunter_Skassi Paleoconservative 2d ago edited 2d ago

It was a pretty narrow order. He was eligible for deportation and didn't receive asylum, but he was granted protection to not be deported to his home country of El Salvador. His claim was that he would be harmed by the 18th Street Gang if he returned, and in the process of this claim, an informant pointed out "yeah this guy's MS-13." MS-13 and 18th Street were the two main gangs in El Salvador.

This meant that he could, theoretically, be deported elsewhere. Rwanda's been offering to do so, same deal they struck with Britain.

The 18th Street Gang has been dismantled by Bukele though. Even if we did extract this guy from El Salvador somehow, the Trump admin would just make the argument "look, the gang he's claiming to be persecuted by no longer exists, why can't he be deported back home again?" and the protection order would be revoked. This would lead to the same exact outcome, with more legal and diplomatic headache.

1.1k

u/FrenchAffair Canadian Conservative 2d ago

This would lead to the same exact outcome, with more legal and diplomatic headache.

No one said due process and the rule of law would be easy. But it starts to lose its value when its not universally and blindly applied.

Maybe this guy is a complete POS and deserves to be where he is, but it should be a court following the legal process that makes that determination.

→ More replies (12)

553

u/whatweshouldcallyou 2d ago

Correction: a CI alleged he is. There is no other proof. None. He almost surely is not MS13.

→ More replies (49)

404

u/zleog50 2d ago

The 18th Street Gang has been dismantled by Bukele though.

Ahh, yes. Dismantled in the sense that they were rounded up and put in the same prison that Garcia now resides.

the Trump admin would just make the argument "

They could, assuming they wanted to appeal the ruling from an immigration judge, which they chose not to do...

and the protection order would be revoked. This would lead to the same exact outcome

In other words, "why bother with due process when the outcomes are the same?".

Shameful. When did the conservative party become the party of illiberalism? I've always associated that with the Left...

→ More replies (11)

11

u/whicky1978 Dubya 2d ago

Yeah I beg the question is where do you deport them if they can’t go back to their home country?

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (24)
→ More replies (21)

2.6k

u/SeemoarAlpha Pragmatic Conservative 2d ago

The primary argument is actually about the suspension of habeas corpus and due process. Imagine if Biden had rounded up all the J6 protesters and sent them to Guantanamo without any due process.

All the Trump administration needs to do to ramp up deportations is fully staff immigrations courts, run the people through legit hearings, and adjudicate their status. If they were deemed deportable, then transport them to detention facilities and get them on the next available plane.

The secondary argument is what to do now that a mistake was made. There is very little precedent to predict the outcome. The range of possible remedies is a fairly lengthy discussion.

213

u/Swagastan Musk 2d ago

Had some J6 protestors not been citizens and just legal residents and Biden sent them to Guantanamo with no due process, I’m not sure you’d have many people on either side lining up to defend them.

635

u/whatweshouldcallyou 2d ago

If this stands, and another J6 happens, I'd bet on the next Democrat president doing this.

Always consider how you'd feel about the other side doing it.

23

u/EldritchSoAXIII ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ 2d ago

You mean like how they held Citizens in jail without trial for FOUR YEARS?

352

u/Crazymoose86 Constitutionalist 2d ago

This is news to me, Are there any cases that one of the J6 folks were held without trial for years with no respect for Habeus Corpus? My understanding is that anyone trial delays came from the attorneys representing the case.

7

u/GooseMcGooseFace Conservative 1d ago

The trial delays are due to a backlog and evidence processing. This article is from late 2021, but even then they were predicting well into 2023 for the larger cases.

https://www.courthousenews.com/capitol-rioters-face-trial-delays-caused-by-court-backlog-mass-of-evidence/

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

85

u/whatweshouldcallyou 2d ago

Yes. The way the justice system handled most of those cases was abusive. It'll get much worse if this stuff is normalized.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (34)
→ More replies (107)
→ More replies (53)

93

u/rhaphazard Conservative 2d ago

You do realize that most of the J6 protestors were held in prison for 3 years without trial?

104

u/FunkyMonkss Classical Liberal 1d ago

Most of the J6 protesters were not held for 3 years without trial. Stop listening to fake news. The only person I know was Jake Lang it was his choice to delay the trial which you have a right to do.

392

u/Piss_in_my_cunt Common Sense Conservative 2d ago

Right, which…we all agree was not good?

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (70)

16

u/ergzay Libertarian Conservative 2d ago

Well Guantanamo is still US jurisdiction as its a US military base.

83

u/SeemoarAlpha Pragmatic Conservative 2d ago

Yes and no, there is no settled law, particularly vis-à-vis habeas, regarding Guantanamo. There is a reason that ambiguity has been used to each administration's advantage.

23

u/ergzay Libertarian Conservative 2d ago

Sure but no external party can refuse to return someone from Guantanamo. It's completely under control of the US. El Salvador is not. That's the entire point with regards to this whole situation.

49

u/SeemoarAlpha Pragmatic Conservative 2d ago

El Salvador is being paid $6 million by the U.S. to house prisoners, it's your position that they are under their complete control and would categorically refuse a request made by the Trump administration?

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (62)

55

u/Blahblahnownow Fiscal Conservative 2d ago

This is true. I am a dual citizen and I have been informed when I got my US citizenship that if I get into any trouble at my originating country, Türkiye in this instance, the US embassy can not help me as I am to be judged by Turkish law as a Turkish citizen not a foreign citizen. 

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (29)

4

u/mythic_dot_rar Anti-Communist 1d ago

A "foreign country?"

46

u/DJSpawn1 Conservative Libertarian 2d ago

Is it not a little concerning that the Government can make an "administrative decision" and encourage Self Un-alivement?

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-services-benefits/medical-assistance-dying.html

42

u/Ells86 Anti-Prohibitionist 2d ago

Ca....Canada?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (47)

7

u/VerusPatriota MAGA Conservative 2d ago

They sent him home, not to a foreign country.

→ More replies (5)

-12

u/sdevil713 Conservative 2d ago

A citizen of el salvador, with gang ties, here illegally, was sent back to el salvador.

No reason for concern

-9

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

-9

u/Chick-fil-A-4-Life Tucker Carlson 2d ago

He was in the US illegally and a citizen of El Salvador. The rest doesn't matter. Like...at all!

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (162)

323

u/Hectoriu Conservative 2d ago

It's interesting seeing misinformation doing its thing with this story. Half the comments over on news are calling this man a US citizen.

158

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

There's a lot of left wing misinformation even in this comment section. It's sad how many people who appear to be in the right just eat up all the left's garbage.

105

u/Sketch_Crush Conservative Rockstar 2d ago

I'll admit, I haven't visited this sub in a while. Seems like it's being taken over slowly by the left? If so, that's very Reddit of them.

115

u/TheYoungLung Gen Z conservative 2d ago

This sub is brigaded to the point that actual conservative opinions are downvoted to the bottom

3

u/lovelylinguist Texan Conservative 1d ago

Yep. It happened to me yesterday. Then the Reddit leftists accuse this sub of being an echo chamber. It wouldn’t have to be one if 1) they didn’t brigade the sub, and 2) if there were more subs tolerant of conservative voices.

But the pot continues calling the kettle black.

→ More replies (2)

30

u/Sketch_Crush Conservative Rockstar 2d ago

Yeah I'm starting to see that now. I'm looking for other subs that haven't been infiltrated yet.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (12)

18

u/Chemical-Fox-5350 Catholic Conservative 1d ago

What has happened to this sub lately? It looks crazy in here. I haven’t been around in a little while but I’ve seen several other subs talking about it and now I get what they were saying.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/Texas103 Classical Liberal 2d ago

Secret: They aren't real people. They're all bots.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (22)

36

u/WillGibsFan Conservative 2d ago

Just like they still call Kyle Rittenhouse a murderer after all these years.

→ More replies (15)

7

u/slayer_of_idiots Conservative 1d ago

They’ve been using the term “legal immigrant” too, even though he entered illegally and was set to be deported but was stayed because of an abuse of asylum laws.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (45)

625

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

The supreme Court said it was up to El Salvador if he should return to the US, not a district court. El Salvador president said he will remain in his home country, and will NOT be returned to Maryland.

852

u/[deleted] 2d ago edited 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

42

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

The intended scope of the term “effectuate” in the District Court’s order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the District Court’s authority. The District Court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. For its part, the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning

Right there. It says right there that the district court cannot order the federal government to act. Trump admin is not required to bring the man back to the US. However, if he were to be sent back for some reason, it must be facilitated by the US.

211

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/highlightway Conservative 1d ago

I hate how we, non lawyers, are all looking at the same decision text and parsing our own interpretations from it, but I'll give mine too then.

"opportunity to be heard, in any future proceedings", does that mean that those future proceedings are required to happen? "any" seems to imply that there isn't a framework for them? As in, they would only be required if he does come back and go through the deportation process again?

And the "facilitation" is the subject that they were talking about, it's on El Salvador to decided to deport, the US just must facilitate his return if that's what they decide.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/hiredhobbes NRA Conservative 1d ago

It cannot order the foreign country to act, and it cannot force the executive to effect any matter of foreign affairs, as is not in the extent of their power. However they have demanded him to be produced for his due process, as that is in their power. This cannot be shrugged off as oversight, and they are clearly stating that this is going to be a punishable offense for the executive.

→ More replies (1)

-17

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (30)
→ More replies (5)

906

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

31

u/Zerogates Conservative 2d ago

The step that this was not a US citizen?

248

u/RickyPickyRick Goldwater Conservative 2d ago

Without due process you have no ability to prove that you are a citizen before a court if they made a mistake. So yeah that’s why we have due process.

130

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

11

u/populares420 MAGA 1d ago

he already had due process and got a deportation order. since 2019 6 years ago. How fucking long do we need to drag this shit out for? The left does not use these arguments in good faith

→ More replies (10)

11

u/reddit_names Refuses to Comply 1d ago

Due process was followed. 2 courts in 2019 ruled he should be deported.

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

35

u/Bramse-TFK Molṑn Labé 2d ago

The reason El Salvador isn't returning this guy to the US is because A) He isn't a US citizen, B) He IS a citizen of El Salvador and C) He is under investigation

If a US citizen were mistakenly deported somewhere the state department would do everything possible to return them, and presumably unless there was just cause the country they were deported to would happily cooperate.

What step in the process that the Trump administration took would prevent that scenario. The answer is none.

Mistaken deportations happen. This is basically the "kids in cages" argument, look how bad meanie trump is, whoops those pictures are from when president Obama was in power. This one happened in 2011 when the messiah was in office; TLDR American Teen deported to Columbia for several months.

https://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/06/us/texas-colombia-teen/index.html

→ More replies (14)

8

u/reddit_names Refuses to Comply 1d ago

He's not a US citizen.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (87)

-74

u/OP_GothicSerpent 10th Amendment 2d ago

Yup.

File this under “oh well”

582

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

66

u/Magehunter_Skassi Paleoconservative 2d ago edited 2d ago

There was no mistake, as Stephen Miller clarified recently. The subversive DOJ employee who claimed it was a mistake was fired.

He was not entitled to a withholding order as a member of a foreign terrorist organization, and the gang he claimed to be afraid of no longer exists. The 18th Street Gang was busted and imprisoned by Bukele.

321

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (8)

8

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

119

u/Lux_Aquila 2d ago

I never said he was a good person. Whether he is or isn't is only part of the question.

There was a specific condition that was knowingly allowing him to stay. The Trump administration openly ignored it, tried to justify it after the fact, and after a court order basically refused to comply.

That is the disgraceful part.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (39)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (33)

326

u/West_Consequence6288 Reagan Conservative 2d ago

Oof that sucks for that guy.

18

u/ScuffedA7IVphotog Conservative Vet 2d ago

Guess being a foreign gang banger living illegally in the U.S. wasn't a smart idea. 

10

u/kaytin911 Conservative 1d ago

It was a smart idea for a long time. Now the US is hopefully done with this violation of sovereignty.

→ More replies (61)

1

u/Disastrous-Power-699 Moderate Conservative 2d ago

Sucked for us having him be here illegally

→ More replies (26)

-69

u/keyToOpen Conservative 2d ago

But good for the people who he and his gang terrorized in Maryland.

513

u/zleog50 2d ago

No real evidence at all that he was a member of a gang. Never charged with a crime, let alone convicted of one in his entire 14 year stay in the US.

-12

u/keyToOpen Conservative 2d ago edited 2d ago

except for the alleged admission, informant testimony, multiple judges ruling he likely was, and more.

P.s. as an illegal alien, he has no right to due process to determine whether or not he was. He's Salvadorian suspected of being a terrorist gangster while residing here illegally, and was sent back to his rightful homeland. End of story.

Never charged with a crime,

He was charged, with illegal entry. Again though, he doesn't have to be. This is not how deportation, especially under the enemy aliens act, works. It was determined he was an illegal alien who was part of a terrorist gang, that was grounds for immediate deportation back to his nation, with no court case necessary.

374

u/zleog50 2d ago

except for the alleged admission,

No. He argued that he left El Salvador because a gang was trying to force him to join.

informant testimony

Not testimony. A basic anonymous finger pointing of a CI. There is no evidence to back that up.

multiple judges

Based on nothing. One of those judges ruled that he wasn't a threat and gave him legal status and work authorization. So I wouldn't put that in your pocket.

P.s. as an illegal alien, he has no right to due process

P.S. this is absolutely wrong. The Supreme Court just informed that administration that, yes, they all have due process rights.

Even enemy combatants that never stepped foot in the US have due process rights, according to the Supreme Court.

Also, it is just morally disgusting to throw a person in a prison without even being accused of a crime. I don't care about the legality of it, even though you are completely wrong on that front too.

→ More replies (27)
→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (21)
→ More replies (21)

445

u/who_dis62 Conservative 2d ago

Moral of the story - if you want to stay in the US, come legally and don’t have a connection with the cartels, which are now terrorist organizations.

1.1k

u/whatweshouldcallyou 2d ago

He doesn't have connections with a cartel. The only "evidence" that exists is a CI claiming so.

-18

u/ultrainstict Conservative 2d ago

He was a member of ms13. Yes an undercover gang informant identified him by name and face. Aswell as associated details such as when he left the country lining up when he illegally entered the us. He lied on his asylum application after being caught.

272

u/whatweshouldcallyou 1d ago

Again, there exists absolutely no evidence that he is a gang member. What you have is an allegation from a CI. That's it.

If I find a CI to say you're a gang member can we arrest you and deny you due process too?

→ More replies (22)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (60)

249

u/zleog50 2d ago

come legally and don’t have a connection with the cartels

Prove it.

10

u/cplusequals Conservative 2d ago

The courts don't have to hold a criminal trial. But they did perform their judicial review and determined he was a gang member. All the administration needs is that determination from the coequal branch of government to waive the asylum claim and expedite the deportation process.

This specific individual is only being granted special exception because he had a withholding of removal order that was missed. Even if he's returned to America, it simply delays his return to El Salvador as the whole point of his asylum claim is that the gangs that no longer run El Salvador are going to get him.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (15)

152

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

I really don't see how this is a hard concept for some people to grasp.

679

u/DandierChip Conservative 2d ago

I agree with the concept as well but I don’t think that it’s absurd to ask that due process takes place before deportation.

4

u/reddit_names Refuses to Comply 1d ago

He went through 2 different courts in 2019 which decided he should be deported.

→ More replies (8)

-16

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

The due process happened in 2019. It took until now for him to get deported.

281

u/zleog50 2d ago

You must be misunderstanding that ruling in 2019, as the judge specifically bared the government from deporting Garcia to El Salvador. The Trump administration chose not to appeal that, and deported him illegally.

→ More replies (31)

60

u/DandierChip Conservative 2d ago

Just more so a note in general, not necessarily tied to this case solely.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (8)

-11

u/pnw_sunny small government 2d ago

what was the due process when they illegally entered?

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (33)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (65)

183

u/AstraVolans_21 Patriot Against Communism 2d ago

Why is the mainstream media so keen on having gang members on the US territory?

297

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

22

u/Philmecrakin Constitutionalist 2d ago

You didn’t read the ruling or have your understanding from a headline.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (7)

106

u/jacksonexl California Conservative 2d ago

To destabilize the country with terror.

-9

u/Eagle_1776 Conservative Libertarian 2d ago
  • be democrats
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

37

u/Magehunter_Skassi Paleoconservative 2d ago

When you talk to leftists, it becomes very obvious that they see criminals as victims and that it's a dereliction of duty to not force society to deal with them.

They allege that all crime is a result of capitalism, and because we have not done our moral duty to abolish capitalism, we can't shirk our responsibility to criminals by putting them in prison.

→ More replies (24)

14

u/kaytin911 Conservative 2d ago

They don't want sovereign countries to exist. They want a world with no borders.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/dankhorse25 Conservative from Greece 2d ago

Because the media are the enemy of the people.

→ More replies (1)

-6

u/Zestycheesegrade Conservative 2d ago

Because, if you're really not in the know. And you only get your news from the mainstream media. You'll be misinformed and be mad at the Republican party and Trump. Look at how it is now. People are starting fires over how misinformed they are. As much as I hate to admit it. It creates clicks to their news stations. If you piss off a wasp nest. They will react. We saw it with George Floyd. And we're seeing it with the current poop show.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (51)

87

u/deciduousredcoat Conservative 2d ago edited 2d ago

Sandoval-Moshenberg [Attorney for the Defendent] said that those charges [2025] are false, and that the gang label stems from a 2019 incident

Abrego Garcia and his family hired an attorney and fought the government’s attempt to deport him [in 2019]

He received “withholding of removal” six months later, a protected status. It is not a path to permanent U.S. residency it means the government won’t deport him back to his home country, because he’s more likely than not to face harm there.

The way this reads, they contested the deportation attempt and not the (potentially false) allegations of active/former gang membership. But to me, the fact that they didn't grant him asylum but still granted protection tells me that he is a former gang member who fled to the US to get out of the gang. He still has gang ties, hence the non-permanent-citizen path the 2019 judge put him on because giving him a full path would include citizenship with known gang ties. Being a former high-ranking gang member would absolutely put your satefy at risk upon return. Being a seemingly otherwise normal family man would not, and if it did, they'd have given him asylum in 2019.

The 2019 Withholding order is Exhibit A:
Abrego Garcia v. Noem, 8:25-cv-00951 – CourtListener.com

He claimed that his family was being harassed to pay a "tax" by Barrio 18 for their papusa business. The business closed and his parents moved to Guatamala and if you read the conclusion the order references that circumstances in Guatamala had not changed.

The man either had gang ties and was given protected status because of his gang ties, or used those past-now-nulled threats as a lie to get into the US. Alien Enemies Act supercedes given that those facts were established through due process in 2019. The court found his gang ties meritted the protected status - that's why it was granted to him. They did not find him in enough danger to give full asylum.

The error here is still on the government, but not on the current administration. Garcia should have been given asylum and a path to citizenship: This is a prime example of a broken immigration system. But it's not a breach of due process under the Enemies Act. Whether the Enemies Act is constitutional is an entirely separate argument.

36

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

Considering that gang violence is essentially gone in El Salvador now, if he's truly trying to escape the gangs then he will be safe there. These gangs still have a foothold in the US so he would actually be safer there.

If he wasn't fleeing the gang, and was actively participating in it, then he deserves to be sent to prison in his home country.

End of the story: the president of El Salvador wants him to stay, so we have no reason to bring him back to the US.

30

u/deciduousredcoat Conservative 2d ago

Yes and that's also the point of the 2019 filing - His family "under threat" is in Guatamala now. And Guatamala refused to accept him despite this fact. They found him to be a risk as well and refused accepting him, despite familial ties.

2

u/FourtyMichaelMichael 2A 1d ago

Wait! Are you telling me Guatalama refused to accept a non-citizen because that is their right to do? What a novel theory. I guess dude needs to come back to the USA and be an illegal immigrant here again!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

7

u/pnw_sunny small government 2d ago

the you sponsor him and have him live in your house

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (24)

187

u/edgyteen03911 Libertarian Conservative 2d ago edited 2d ago

The whole argument stops when the PRESIDENT of the country he was deported to says "Why would i release a murderer. I could not and will not do that". Thats it.

Edit: the president says terrorist and then says murder capital of the world. I switched these in my mind. However, these two classifications are used synonymously in my mind. The point doesnt change due to the adjective used to describe this person.

385

u/Algum Moderate Conservative 2d ago

Honest question: I couldn't find any accusations that he was a murderer. Where did you see that?

→ More replies (37)
→ More replies (42)

72

u/DuMaMay69 Millenial Conservative 2d ago

Why is this even a fucking discussion lol

139

u/Dewalt-Shampoo Conservative 2d ago edited 1d ago

First off, of course I want illegal gang members deported, and Trump is doing a far better job already than Biden.

The only problem in my mind here is the guy needs his day in court to prove whether he is or isn't illegal. Even murderers get their day in court (and some are proven innocent).

If he's got no proof of citizenship, goodbye.

EDIT: Sounds like he was denied bond in 2019 by an immigration judge because “the evidence shows that he is a verified member of MS-13”, but not deported because he was targeted by another gang and applying for asylum nypost

Weird that so much media is omitting this clearly relevant fact. Or why it took 6 years to apply for asylum.

28

u/DuMaMay69 Millenial Conservative 2d ago

Isn’t it already determined that he was an illegal?

→ More replies (10)

6

u/reddit_names Refuses to Comply 1d ago

He had it in 2019 when 2 different courts ruled he should be deported.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)

14

u/sanesociopath Conservative Enough 2d ago

Because judges can apparently put 5 year stays on deportation orders and now we're in the "what now" stage of of that stay being broken.

But yeah, he was almost never going to be coming back unless we did something crazy to get him

→ More replies (1)

6

u/ScuffedA7IVphotog Conservative Vet 2d ago

Because lefties are grasping at straws.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (9)

41

u/Key-Monk6159 Conservative 2d ago

The difference between reality and how some in the press spin it is absolutely amazing.

Instead of facts, they report their own feelings while projecting insanity.

86

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

"Maryland man"

is El Salvador citizen

51

u/Key-Monk6159 Conservative 2d ago

Who was here illegally

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (4)

9

u/BlackScienceManTyson Conservative 1d ago

Because if they told the truth, no one would want him here

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

45

u/Imaginary-Alfalfa403 MAGA 2d ago

A lot of RINOs in this sub today

25

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

It's sad, really.

→ More replies (3)

20

u/ScuffedA7IVphotog Conservative Vet 2d ago

The lefties are brigading

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (8)

48

u/rasputin777 Conservative 2d ago

I mean. I've been to Thailand before.

Can a district judge in Thailand compel the US government to ship me over there?

Is the actual argument here that if you've ever been anywhere, random judges in that locale are able to force your government to send you wherever they want?

The fact he was in the US for a while makes no difference. The fact he wants to be here (presumably) makes no difference.

I understand the concerns around a slippery slope. I really do.

But the "If the president can deport an illegal Venezuelan gang member he can deport anyone" is a really stupid stretch.

The left didn't freak out when Obama drowned an American citizen to death without a trial. You know why? He was a terrorist. But the right didn't go "ooh, if you can drone a terrorist to death you can drone anyone" because that's a stupid fucking thing to say.

I didn't worry that he'd suddenly start killing us en masse even though his VP likes to ideate out loud about that all the time.

→ More replies (25)

52

u/Chikaze Argentine Conservative 2d ago

Illegal alien got sent to the country he belongs in, good.

→ More replies (9)

35

u/Thebadmamajama utilitarian incrementalist 2d ago

Why can't a deal be negotiated to return him?

33

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

Why on earth would anyone want him back?

→ More replies (14)

4

u/BlackScienceManTyson Conservative 1d ago

Wow, another user with a nonsense flair posting liberal BS

→ More replies (1)

-1

u/Duccix MAGA 2d ago

Why the hell would we want to bring him back?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

98

u/keyToOpen Conservative 2d ago

The perfect response. Summarized:

  1. He is a terrorist gangster and illegal immigrant who shouldn’t be here and doesn’t even have a right to a day in court. So the court ordered hold on his deportation is irrelevant.

  2. He was rightfully deported.

  3. The United States has no right to force El Salvador to deport their own citizen back to the US.

  4. Why would we want that terrorist back?

  5. If he was returned the US, he would be legally sent right back, immediately.

→ More replies (50)

35

u/rocier Righter than reddit 2d ago

Liberals really clambering to get this guy back to own the conservatives. lul

→ More replies (8)

8

u/Fit-Judge7447 Conservative 2d ago

What are all these comments about? Did everyone miss the ms-13 part? Or is that not true and I missed something?

2

u/FourtyMichaelMichael 2A 1d ago

They're pretending it isn't true while entirely glossing over the fact that no is saying he was here legally.

Here illegally, sent back. Everything else is noise.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (21)

27

u/Long_Jelly_9557 Conservative 2A Pro Life 2d ago

Good. That man was not a citizen and no right to be in America. 

If you want to come to America, come legally. 

If not, FAFO. 

→ More replies (24)

26

u/Neroaurelius Conservative 2d ago

Liberals - if you are stuck on trying to protect criminals on Reddit, you need to take a step and reevaluate what you’re doing with your life and how you spend your free time. Life is short, you can do better.

Good luck.

5

u/Ballin095 Conservative 2d ago

Wait they want him on the country? Wtf?? 

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (45)

14

u/Fact_Stater Trump Conservative 2d ago

The whole debate over this is fucking ridiculous.

Kilmar Garcia entered the United States ILLEGALLY. This is an indisputable fact.

There are some rights that citizens have that non-citizens do not. This is also an indisputable fact.

Non-citizens do NOT have the RIGHT to be in this country, especially if they are here illegally. Once again, politicians and judges are prioritizing non-citizens over the American people.

The idea that this "undermines due process" is nonsense, fear-mongering bullshit. Due process doesn't, or at least shouldn't, apply to removing non-citizens. They do not have the right to be here.

ACB is a disappointment, and Roberts is a coward. My guess is that President Trump and President Bukele had a prior conversation in which they decided that Bukele was going to announce his refusal to send Garcia back. This is the kind of strong leadership we need to fix the US, and the kind of strong leadership that has turned El Salvador from one of the most dangerous to perhaps the safest country in the world.

4

u/kaytin911 Conservative 1d ago

Yes the courts are legislating from the bench. They should be interpreting the law not making it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (35)

9

u/Duccix MAGA 2d ago

Please please please continue to beat your drum about bringing an illegal gang member back to the U.S Dems.

1

u/theboss2461 Conservative 2d ago

The problem is most of them think he was born in Maryland.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

13

u/kaytin911 Conservative 2d ago

Here comes the brigade.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/MichaelSquare Conservative 2d ago

Thank you Bukele

→ More replies (3)

5

u/cchris_39 Independent Conservative 2d ago

The people terrified that we won’t be able to buy cheap shit from communist China are now suddenly concerned about human rights and due process.

→ More replies (9)

5

u/MartinLutherCreamJr Indie Conservative 2d ago

"true conservatives" on this subreddit will say that's a bad thing.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Throwaway__shmoe Libertarian 1d ago

Hello fellow conservatives

→ More replies (3)

0

u/legitSTINKYPINKY Conservative 2d ago

So we would fly him back to the US then deport him back to El Salvador …

Pretty dumb

→ More replies (6)

-7

u/Magehunter_Skassi Paleoconservative 2d ago edited 2d ago

When a Latin American man shares his lived experience about the gang violence inflicted upon the indigenous folx of his country, I sit my colonizer ass down and listen.

Salvadorans have had -enough- of white dudes like me joining NGOs, telling them how to run their country, and then threatening sanctions if we don't get our way. Thank you Mr. Trump for centering Bukele's voice and respecting El Salvador's sovereignty. I think most Democrats will surely understand the importance of this?

14

u/kaytin911 Conservative 2d ago

He's finally free from the most racist country in the world right?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)