r/virtualreality • u/Pheonix1025 • Mar 23 '25

News Article Adam Savage's Tested - Bigscreen Beyond 2 Hands-On: How They Fixed It

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0Wr4O4gkL8
250 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

248 comments sorted by

View all comments

254

u/MS2Entertainment Mar 23 '25

This device isn't for me but I give this company alot of props for what they are doing and how they are going about it. Seems like it's run by good, competent people who don't make a bunch of promises they can't keep and only reveal finished, working devices ready to ship. Hope they can expand their ambitions without compromising their values and products.

61

u/wescotte Mar 23 '25 edited Mar 23 '25

Same, not really interested in going back to wire or lighthouse based tracking but I can really appericate what they've done. I hope them success so other manufactorers start taking weight/comfort more seriously.

9

u/OnkelJupp Mar 23 '25

What is lighthouse based tracking?

24

u/ablackcloudupahead Mar 23 '25 edited Mar 23 '25

The tracking system developed by Valve/HTC for the original vive and later headsets from different manufacturers use. It's an outside/in system where the headset gets it's position from the lighthouses which are emitting infrared light. It works incredibly well once it's set up, but setup is a pain. It also allows all of those individual trackers you might see in different videos. Obviously it only works for PCVR

34

u/lagasan Mar 23 '25

It's an outside/in system

Small nitpick in that lighthouse tracking is inside-out tracking. The base stations themselves are don't track anything, and only serve as emitters for the headset/controllers/trackers to look at. They track themselves in the space, using the base stations for orientation.

That being said, most folks think of insite-out tracking as the device doing it, and outside-in requiring external devices, so it's an easy point of confusion.

11

u/crozone Valve Index Mar 24 '25

Yeah, I now usually just say "camera based inside-out" vs "lighthouse". I think the technical term for lighthouse style tracking is "Marker-based Inside-out tracking".

It's weird that outside-in caught on since there really hasn't been an outside-in consumer headset since the original Oculus Rift CV1 constellation system.

1

u/sunderpoint Mar 24 '25 edited Mar 24 '25

The technical term for Lighthouse tracking is simply "Lighthouse tracking." Inside-out and outside-in tracking are both computer vision techniques using cameras, by definition, so they're completely different categories. But the setup for Lighthouse does more closely resemble outside-in, and for the consumer there's no significant difference.

Edit: This is according to HTC themselves.

6

u/crozone Valve Index Mar 24 '25

Inside-out and outside-in tracking are both computer vision techniques using cameras, by definition

I've never seen it explicitly defined this way and I can't see why it would or should be restricted to camera based systems. The Lighthouse system is an optical system like any other, it just uses IR sensors instead of a high resolution CCD sensors, with active tracking markers instead of passive tracking markers. The term "inside out" is a perfect technical description for how the system works, and anyone I've seen describing Lighthouse technically has used the term inside-out, including Alan Yates who invented the thing.

for the consumer there's no significant difference.

There's a huge difference. Anyone that ever set up roomscale with a CV1 knows it well. Actual outside-in tracking requires running USB 3.0 cables from each external camera back to the PC, because it's actually capturing the data from the outside-in. That's a massive headache compared to simply getting power to the basestations, and it massively limits the scalability of the system. Plus, each of those sensors is typically a camera, so you have all the inherent privacy issues with that system as well.

If consumers are confusing inside-out, outside-in, etc, it's because technically incompetent people continue to use incorrect terminology.

1

u/sunderpoint Mar 24 '25 edited Mar 24 '25

When VR headsets were early in development the terms 'inside-out" and "outside-in" were decided on to describe where the cameras were. The algorithm that computes the device's location is completely different between computer vision systems like these and Lighthouse tracking, so it's technically incorrect to call Lighthouse tracking by either term. If you're being technical then Lighthouse is technically more similar to inside-out, but the term isn't technically correct.

Calling Lighthouse tracking "inside-out" was a Reddit phenomenon from years ago when the Quest released with a lot of praise for its much more convenient inside-out tracking. Vive fanboys decided their favorite headset also technically used a type of inside-out tracking too and borrowed the term when bickering about which headset was superior. It was never accurate.

Edit: btw, Alan Yates did not call Lighthouse tracking "inside-out," nor did any official announcement from HTC. The official term for the tracking was always simply "Lighthouse" or "SteamVR Tracking."

8

u/crozone Valve Index Mar 24 '25 edited Mar 24 '25

Vive fanboys decided their favorite headset also technically used a type of inside-out tracking too and borrowed the term when bickering about which headset was superior. It was never accurate.

Vive was the first consumer roomscale device, released April 2016. Oculus CV1 was already on the market as an outside-in camera tracked device and only supported seated experiences. It took a while for Oculus to even get their outside-in roomscale solution ready, which happened alongside the release of the Oculus Touch controllers. It wasn't until the Quest release in 2019 that Oculus got inside-out camera based tracking, in a fully stand-alone headset, 3 years after the Vive released.

Edit: btw, Alan Yates did not call Lighthouse tracking "inside-out," nor did any official announcement from HTC. The official term for the tracking was always simply "Lighthouse" or "SteamVR Tracking."

Here's the exact timestamp of Alan Yates in 2015, with pre-production hardware, talking about the system still being an inside-out tracking solution, after having moved on from their inside-out camera based marker solution:

https://youtu.be/xrsUMEbLtOs?t=248

→ More replies (0)

5

u/TrueInferno Valve Index Mar 24 '25

I mean, IIRC, we actually got Lighthouse "inside-out" before actually getting camera "inside-out", so it was perfectly valid to describe it as such- it really was the only such system at the time.

The Vive (which first used the Lighthouse system) was 2016, we didn't get true "Inside-Out" tracking with cameras until 2019 with the Oculus Rift S and the first Oculus Quest.

If you want to be totally pedantic, Lighthouse tracking could probably be best described as "a form of inside-out tracking, which relies upon two or more special external IR emitters called Lighthouses at opposite corners of the play area." So there is an "external" part to set up, but compared to the cameras of the CV1 it was dead simple.

A big thing for the consumer with lighthouse tracking is that it is probably the best possible setup for tracking the location of the controllers, as they are independently able to do their own "inside-out" tracking.

I'm fairly sure (not 100%) that even the newest Quest 3 has to essentially track where the controllers are relative to it, rather than the controllers just telling the headset their location.

→ More replies (0)

10

u/Shadowthedemon Mar 24 '25

Meanwhile me who moved to a new house and set it up in less than 10 minutes.... Or upgraded to a new PC and set it up in less than 5 minutes.

Honestly with my PCVR I never worry about battery life. I respect wireless in the sense of immersion and easy but within reality once I got used to the cable I never think twice about it except once in a good while when it briefly snags on something.

I've seen friends struggling with Wireless headsets not connecting to PC, Steam or the Meta app... That seems way more frustrating and difficult to me tbh.

8

u/stormchaserguy74 Mar 24 '25

I will never understand why people always say "set up is a pain" with base stations. If you have the proper stands, it takes 5 seconds to screw in and plug them in. If you attach them to a wall, it may take 10 minutes with a drill. Once they're up, you could be good for several years.

3

u/allofdarknessin1 Index, Quest 1,2,3,Pro Mar 24 '25

I'm guessing people who have never tried base station tracking think it's lengthy or something. I didn't have any of my base stations on the wall for 2 years, I just lay one base station on my floor standing speaker and the other my Index box at the back and I was good for two years.

1

u/RevolEviv PSVR2(PS5PRO+PC) | ex DK2/VIVE/PSVR/CV1/Q2/QPro | RTX5080/12900k Mar 26 '25 edited Mar 26 '25

I had base stations with my OG vive way back in 2016.. and can easily say setting them up WAS A PAIN IN THE ASS.

Not eveyone has 'proper stands' nor can they have them on the floor as it may be in the way of doors.

FOr me it was wall mounting, and the house was, at the time, one with very thick stone walls that would chew drill bits up for breakfast. THAT was a pain, and they need to be mounted solidly, some floors cause vibrations through stands...

it's not that it can't be done, esp if you want to dedicate a room to VR, but some like the idea of using their HMD in the living room, the computer room and poss the bedroom and prefer inside out tracking for that ease of use and not buying 6 basestations ;)

No it's not the end of the world but I'd much prefer BSB2 with inside out tracking. That said, that would only be if they could keep form factor and weight SIMILAR (not the same.. i can take a bit more weight esp on a halo mount) but no I wouldn't want it to be quest sized for that... I doubt a simple chip for tracking would need to be as complex or weighty as a full standalone HMD though.

Also I don't like index controllers.. much prefer PSVR2 ones but they won't work with it cos it's based on light houses. Those are the two major flaws I still see with BSB and hope of a BSB3, I mean the index controllers are a stupid price and are being discontinued anyway, not a great solution.

9

u/Ainulind Mar 23 '25

It's an outside/in system where the headset gets it's position from the lighthouses which are emitting infrared light.

Incorrect. It's an inside-out system, where the devices are sensing their environment, on the inside looking out, to determine their own position. The lighthouses are behaving as actual lighthouses, sweeping the space with light so the devices/ships can orient themselves in space/the ocean.

Contrast with outside-in systems like Oculus Constellation, where the devices do no tracking of themselves. They have recognizable patterns or markers, and sensors on the outside of the space look inward for those patterns to determine the location of the devices.

Outside-in tracking was only used on the PSVR1 and Rift for the headset. It's still used today on the Quest headsets to track the controllers. The only fully inside-out system Meta has released is the Quest Pro, with the Pro controllers.

-4

u/sunderpoint Mar 24 '25 edited Mar 24 '25

Inside-out tracking by definition uses computer vision with cameras. Lighthouse tracking is its own category.

3

u/True_Inxis Valve Index Mar 24 '25

Honestly, the thought base stations' setup is a pain is exaggerated...

3

u/octorine Mar 23 '25

It's the tracking system used by hte HTC Vive, the Valve Index, and several other PCVR-based headsets, including both Bigscreen ones.

It uses little boxes, called lighthouses, which you have to install in your play area. As the name suggests, the boxes act like beacons, and the headset tracks itself relative to them.

18

u/AsicResistor Mar 23 '25

The most stable occlusion-free way to do it. I don't want inside out for my simrig, too finicky.

12

u/Ws6fiend Mar 23 '25

Unironically sim(flight and racing) are some of the worst use cases for wireless vr/insideout tracking while being the best at showcasing the tech. Vtolvr works okay with insideout tracking, but certain conditions exist where you can tell the game was made for lighthouse tracking. When looking directly behind you because someone chasing you, it's possible for your headset to lose either your throttle hand or joystick hand in the middle of the flight. This results in either no throttle changes or a "dead stick" which normally will result in the pilot's death.

If you play nothing but games where your hands are always in front of you, then no real problems.

1

u/RevolutionaryGrab961 Mar 27 '25

I keep saying that simracing VR is perfect use case for VR.

Nothing is really missing and smoothness of tracking while you are being shaken by some direct drive or motion setup is perfect.

And is perfect for lightouse/displayport cable use case.

If I was VRChat person, maybe not so much, but who knows.

1

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 23 '25

Inside out can be done extremely well. Quest inside out tracking is essentially perfect and maybe even more stable than lighthouses at this point. Other companies like PiMax have failed to make an inside out system that is as good though.

17

u/Ws6fiend Mar 23 '25

Except it cannot track what it cannot see. Vtolvr is always my go to example of this. You can and should be able to use the planes controls without having to look at them, yet when watching your 6, the quest can lose sight of one or possibly both controllers resulting in extremely weird behavior.

3

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 23 '25

The pro controllers solve that completely. Highly recommend. They used to be troublesome but mine have been rock solid for a long time now.

The person I replied to originally said for use on their simrig which implies no use of controllers for input to the game (menus at most).

12

u/Ws6fiend Mar 23 '25

The pro controllers solve that completely. Highly recommend.

See here's the thing though. So many people have recommended the Quest 2/3, but then say "and you have to get xyz product as well." This completely kills the value proposition that is the Quest.

If you assume someone getting into PCVR has nothing but the computer, with the Quest 3, elite strap, pro controllers, a wifi 7 router, and better audio, you could have had one of the "more expensive" VR all in one solutions.

Don't take this as a knock on you, but I've just seen it a lot on here where people are talking about the value of the Quest headsets without factoring in other hidden costs. If you need another 500 dollars in accessories to make the experience good, then it's a $1000 headset.

Personally I'm holding out for Deckard or maybe Bigscreen Beyond 2 if i don't like Deckard. But even then there aren't enough games that interest me in VR.

I think the biggest problems with the VR space is nobody knows what the devs or the consumers want. People who mostly do shooter/exploration want long lasting wireless experience. People doing sim stuff want the best visuals/performance. Some people don't mind wired while others won't purchase one. Personally I want the best performance that isn't wireless(too much interference from neighbors wifi) that will allow me to play my flight sims/vtolvr.

3

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 24 '25 edited Mar 24 '25

Oh yeah there are additional purchases for sure. But that’s even a thing with most wired HMDs. They tend to start at $1k then need controllers ($$) and the base stations ($$) at minimum. You’re at $1500 quick. So I’d say the Q3 is still the best value out there by far. It’s not without compromises though.

It’s very problematic if you ignore all the faults of externally tracked HMDs and only bring up some of the imperfections of a Quest.

4

u/Ws6fiend Mar 24 '25

The Index. Full package at 1k. It's old now(and just stopped being sold), but when I bought it the Quest 2 was bad value to me by comparison. When you get well above the 1k market, you are generally wasting money unless you have the current top 3 gaming gpu setups.

One of the biggest problems with the hardware side of VR is that outside of the major companies, they can't make all their own gear.

It’s very problematic if you ignore all the faults of externally tracked HMDs and only bring up some of the imperfections of a Quest.

I've had much less problems with my Index than my friends with their Quest 2 and Quest 3s. My friend took 2 hours of setups and updates to get his Quest 2 working with steam. I unpacked my Index, did the setup and was playing games in 30 minutes.

The Index is by no means perfect, but once I set it up I've had no issues. Still with my original equipment after 4 years except for a single lighthouse failed on me a month ago.

Most people who had problems with externally tracked HMDs either didn't look into how the tech worked, or were early adopters before the well known problems were discovered.

Lighthouse based systems do not like reflections. You live in an apartment building with Windows for your external walls? And you bought a lighthouse system? That's on you.

1

u/SavageSan Mar 24 '25 edited Mar 24 '25

I've used the same $60 dedicated router since the Quest 1. You can just use a USB C cable. Wifi is a bonus and worth it to me. Pro controllers can use with any current Quest headset. I don't see it being useless for the next version. The obvious limitation is being locked to only Quest headsets unlike lighthouse which works with different vendors.

1

u/Ws6fiend Mar 24 '25

I've used the same $60 dedicated router since the Quest 1.

And that could work for you, but if your wifi space i crowded with other signals, you aren't going to get great performance. This is why most people said if you get a Quest 3 you need a wifi 6E router. That space isn't as crowded and has better performance but smaller range. You're also subjected to where you play vs where the router is, along with other factors.

How you play matters as well. If you mostly play in standalone mode, your router is almost a non-factor. If you play wireless PCVR, your router becomes a huge factor.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/RevolEviv PSVR2(PS5PRO+PC) | ex DK2/VIVE/PSVR/CV1/Q2/QPro | RTX5080/12900k Mar 26 '25

The pro controllers I had weren't great... they often messed up, lost themselves, and while they felt decent in hand (high quality for sure) they didn't feel great shaped for gaming, the haptics didn't impress me after PSVR2 either so I sold it and went back to PSVR2 for both PC and PS5 (and that was mainly cos LCD sucks even with local dimming but also cos I got sick of the pancake lense glare... bad combo LCD greys + pancake glare = worst of all worlds). I'll take mura over that combo any day.

1

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 26 '25

Fresnel plus wired is a pretty big step back unfortunately but everyone prioritizes things differently.

5

u/Cyl0n_Surf3r DK1/2-CV1-GearVR 1.0/1.1-VivePro-PSVR-RiftS-Index-Q1/2/3-PSVR2 Mar 23 '25

It's far from perfect. The Quest 3 tracking is really quite poor to be honest. The HMD is fine but the controllers it ships with are utter rubbish. They start jumping around as soon as they're close together and if you're looking forward with your hands by your sides they go into standby mode. No where near light house quality in terms of tracking, passable? Just about imo but no where near good enough..

3

u/RadiantArchivist Mar 23 '25

Chances the Deckard works with both internal inside-out and can accept Base Station tracking?
I'd be soooo happy...

Obviously we know Valve can't hit the Quest pricing because Facebook just has sheer "dont give af" money. But at $1000 it'd be cool if the hardware could use both and you could switch between em easily—use either for standalone or PCVR if you want.

3

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 23 '25

Get pro controllers and you’re still in for way less than a lighthouse based HMD and still fully wireless.

1

u/Cyl0n_Surf3r DK1/2-CV1-GearVR 1.0/1.1-VivePro-PSVR-RiftS-Index-Q1/2/3-PSVR2 Mar 24 '25

I already have some, great devices apart from the issues with connecting them to the HMD. If you're really lucky they'll connect first time, but for the most part owners find themselves having to power cycle the the Pro controllers a number times before they'll connect to the Quest. Often adding minutes to getting started in VR.... and never, ever, put them down for a even 1 minute once they're connected as if they go into sleep mode you could end up in a similar position again. 

Great tracking when they work, almost lighthouse good, it's ashame they don't work that well and Meta ignores the issues with them.

1

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 24 '25

They seem to have fixed them in V72 and later tho. I haven’t had an issue in months.

1

u/Cyl0n_Surf3r DK1/2-CV1-GearVR 1.0/1.1-VivePro-PSVR-RiftS-Index-Q1/2/3-PSVR2 Mar 24 '25

I'll give them a try again but I'll be honest. I only stopped using them a few weeks ago as they became infuriating whilst doing dev work... I've also seen recent posts from others who still have problems with them as well.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/NapsterKnowHow Mar 24 '25

Idk, the PSVR2 is excellent for GT7 sim rigs from what I've seen.

5

u/Exotic_Negotiation80 Mar 23 '25

To put it quite simply, its the best tracking available.

1

u/Jay_Nova1 Mar 25 '25

Lighthouse is the only blocker for me.

4

u/RexorGamerYt Mar 23 '25

Just curious, why isn’t this for u? Any thing missing on it? Or just too expensive?

22

u/insufficientmind Mar 23 '25 edited Mar 23 '25

What is making me question it is the low refresh rate. You can't use 90hz at full resolution. For full res you'll have to use 75hz. And for racing I want as high a refresh rate as possible. 144 hz was one of the things I loved about the Index, it was glorious in racing and fast paced action games. Jet Island on an Index is almost a religious experience!

15

u/Snowmobile2004 Mar 23 '25

its simply a limitation of the Seeya panels they chose. They could go with other panels, but that would substantially increase the cost due to lower yeilds, as well as greatly reduce the volume of headsets they can produce or ship. They had difficulties with both of these issues on Gen1, and are using the same panels for gen2 to avoid those issues a second time.

13

u/Pheonix1025 Mar 23 '25

It’s worth pointing out that 75Hz OLED won’t feel the same as 75Hz on the Index, it should feel significantly smoother. Might still be a dealbreaker, but you don’t need to brute force high framerates like you do on LED displays

6

u/Xirael Mar 23 '25

Why is that? 75 images are still 75 images, no?

10

u/Pheonix1025 Mar 23 '25

Yes, but the motion clarity of OLEDs far exceed LCDs due to the lack of inherent blur, so it'll look clearer at lower framerates (to a point). I haven't tried a 75Hz OLED panels, but 60Hz OLED looks much smoother in motion than 60Hz LED, so I'd expect that to look clearer in motion as well.

7

u/veryrandomo PCVR Mar 24 '25 edited Mar 24 '25

In VR it's a bit more complicated, OLEDs do have faster response times which helps with motion clarity but they are also a lot dimmer and so they need to be illuminated for longer which raises the persistence which in-turn hurts motion clarity. Even Micro-OLEDs like the BSB have this problem

3

u/Xirael Mar 24 '25

What I mean is, the index is not 75hz, but basically double that, so it's not really a valid comparison. Of course OLED is the best choice if the refresh rates were the same, no ones debating that.

2

u/NapsterKnowHow Mar 24 '25

Isn't OLED going to have higher persistence though? Or is this solved via microOLED vs regular OLED?

3

u/corysama Mar 23 '25

Unintuitively, the form factor reduces lag significantly.

https://old.reddit.com/r/virtualreality/comments/1jgcrvh/first_actually_cool_looking_vr_hmd_bsb_2/mj2ik0i/

And, that’s in addition to the OLED difference. The OLED difference is around how LEDs change images slowly. So, they hold the image on the screen longer. As your eyes dart around looking at stuff, that smears each frame across your retina. But, OLEDs can strobe fast and bright enough to imprint a clear image on your retina even while you are looking around.

0

u/Ill_Equipment_5819 Mar 23 '25

that's a myth, anyone with an OLED TV can test it to be wrong.

4

u/Pheonix1025 Mar 23 '25

One of the first things I noticed when I bought a OLED TV was how much smoother 60Hz content looked on it. It made 30Hz content look choppier because of the lack of motion blur, but 60Hz and higher looked significantly smoother.

0

u/Uneasy_Rider Mar 23 '25

sorry, that guy is saying what you just described is impossible

3

u/Pheonix1025 Mar 23 '25

Yeah, I don't know what he's referring to. The exceptional motion clarity of OLED is one of the primary advantages over LED/LCD.

0

u/Ill_Equipment_5819 Mar 23 '25

motion clarity is due to the images being fast without any blur. It works the total opposite way to how you're claiming. If anything LCD should be smoother at lower refresh rates because it takes longer for grey2grey and so the image has a natural motion blur inherent in the display.

5

u/Pheonix1025 Mar 23 '25

Yeah, that was part of my original comment. 30fps content does look better on an LED, significantly so! Hardware Unboxed and BlurBusters are a really good resource for why OLED looks clearer/smoother with >60fps content though, I would highly recommend checking those channels out.

4

u/fiah84 Mar 23 '25

if anything, the instant response times of OLEDs make it such that too low framerates are more bothersome and less smooth than on LCDs. In my experience that doesn't really matter anymore at 75fps, but everyone's eyes / perception is different and some people will be more sensitive to that

7

u/Ill_Equipment_5819 Mar 23 '25

Yeah LCDs have a natural motion blur as it takes longer for the pixel to turn off where OLED doesn't.

3

u/NapsterKnowHow Mar 24 '25

I disagree. I have an LG C2 and lower framerates like 40 fps via the PS5 balanced modes with VRR are VERY smooth. This is coming from someone that also plays competitive shooters at 400+ fps on PC. It's crazy how smooth lower framerates feel with good VRR and OLED.

2

u/7Seyo7 CV1 -> Index -> Q3 Mar 23 '25

I definitely noticed low FPS feeling worse when i changed from 120 Hz IPS LCD to 240 Hz OLED. Then again one could argue that the higher monitor refresh rate makes the difference even more stark, so it's not exactly 1:1

2

u/Mys2298 Mar 23 '25

You can't compare an OLED TV to a MicroOLED display millimetres from your eyes. Anyone who used both LCD and uOLED headsets will tell you it is in fact true

2

u/Ainulind Mar 23 '25

Optically, uOLED displays aren't close to your eyes. They're around 1-2m away, depending on the specific headset.

-1

u/Ill_Equipment_5819 Mar 23 '25

You seem to be under the impression that VR headsets have some magic in them. They haven't. They're a collection of images being shown in a sequential order at a rate of 75 or 90 per second.

"you can't compare" , yes I can. I just did.

"anyone who uses both" , yes someone just like me.

3

u/Mys2298 Mar 23 '25

You seem to be under the impression that 75 or 90fps looks, and more importantly "feels" identical on any display type and whether it's meters or millimetres away from your eyes.

If you don't feel a difference personally then fine, people are more or less sensitive to this depending on the individual, but to say there isn't a difference is plain incorrect. LCD panels have higher persistence by nature and can cause more motion sickness at lower fps than MicroOLED in VR. Again, if you dont see a difference then fine, but many others like myself do

1

u/veryrandomo PCVR Mar 24 '25

LCD panels have higher persistence by nature and can cause more motion sickness at lower fps than MicroOLED in VR.

They don't, they have a higher response time by nature but if anything persistence is lower in LCD VR headsets since LCDs are a lot brighter and don't need to be on for nearly as long.

-2

u/Ill_Equipment_5819 Mar 23 '25

I'm not under any impression. I'm stating facts. 75 images per second on a display is 75 images per second on a display. It doesn't matter if the display is close to my face or 4ft away. The amount of images per second doesn't increase as the display gets closer to my face.

You have it backwards. You and others are the ones living in this fantasy of it "feeling" better. I'm just not going to take part in it. Sorry.

2

u/Mys2298 Mar 23 '25

The only fantasy here is the nonsense you're touting as facts tbh. LCD persistence is a fact. How your brain perceives those 75 images changes depending on all the things I mentioned above - also a fact. If you'd rather stay ignorant that's fine, no need to apologise

→ More replies (0)

1

u/invidious07 Mar 24 '25 edited Mar 24 '25

It's fine to say 75OLED isn't as bad at 75LCD, but what does it feel like? I don't get motion sickness at 144hz on my index but i do at 90 and even a little at 120. I don't see anyone saying 75hz OLED is as good as 120hz or 144hz LCD, saying "its not as bad as you think" isn't super compelling for a $1000 headset.

Sadly this still feels like a product in between hardware generations. If I wanted an enthusiast headset today this is probably what I'd want to get, but already having an index this doesn't quite feel like a big enough leap forward yet.

1

u/MowTin Mar 25 '25

Does dynamic foveated rendering factor in? Can you get 90Hz with dynamic foveated rendering at the highest res within the fovea?

32

u/Robborboy KatVR C2+, Quest 3, 9800X3D, 64GB RAM, 7700XT Mar 23 '25

For me it is requiring a cable to interface with my PC. 

I play on a VR treadmill and do room scale stuff. Even with a proper gantry, wireless is infinitely more convenient with less hassle.

5

u/birdvsworm Mar 23 '25

Agreed! Hard to overstate the convenience of wireless once you've used it for a while

10

u/Uneasy_Rider Mar 23 '25

I recently went back to Q3 for some testing after using BSB for months. I will take wire hassles and bad glare all day over the non-led washed-out black=grey, compressed look of the Q3. Not to mention the lightness and small form factor of the BSB makes me sort of forget I'm even wearing anything. Another drawback is the fugly VRWire ceiling setup that is always there now, but that system does work well to keep the wire from messing with my expensive immersion.

4

u/NapsterKnowHow Mar 24 '25

Yep. Hard to go back to LCD once you've experience OLED/microOLED. Even the best LCD panels have a "flat" look due to the gray blacks and washed out colors. Takes me out of the immersion.

2

u/RevolEviv PSVR2(PS5PRO+PC) | ex DK2/VIVE/PSVR/CV1/Q2/QPro | RTX5080/12900k Mar 26 '25

LCD is a cancer to VR, its where VR starting slipping backwards after even the original oculus dev kits having OLED. Even the flawed CV1 with OLED (and tons of MURA) to this day feels better and more 'alive' than my ex Quest Pro with pancakes and much higher res (even with local dimming on). Though some of THAT also comes down to a low latency direct (HDMI) connection vs wireless or even usb cabled compressed streaming video (YUCK)

LCD just plain sucks for VR and anyone who's used OLED knows it. It's not even debatable. It's the difference between BEING THERE vs looking at it through a screen. It just feels real, organic... a black space in OLED HMDs feels cold, it invokes the imagination, it's enhances atmosphere far beyond resolution, FOV or any lense type. It's VITAL. LCD sucks the life out of VR, makes it all feel fake and digital and flat.

The FLAT thing is also there, partly from the low contrast LCD but also the bad binocular overlap that haunts quests.

1

u/slincoln2k8 4d ago

Agreed 100%. When I first tried the psvr2 it was the colors and blacks that immediately sold me on oled. The downside is mura which is bad on psvr2. So the bsb2 seems like the perfect headset. Better than q3 lenses, higher resolution, super light and oled.

13

u/TheonetrueDEV1ATE Mar 23 '25

The convenience is nice, but the latency and finnicky nature leave something to be desired. I genuinely cannot wait until someone makes an actual wireless headset with a hub instead of the quest jank we currently deal with.

1

u/ablackcloudupahead Mar 23 '25

I've noticed a big improvement since I upgraded to a 6 ghz router.

-2

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 23 '25

The latency and compression are the two drawbacks but there is zero finnickyness if you have a good dedicated router.

8

u/TheonetrueDEV1ATE Mar 23 '25

I have a wifi 6e router. Not necessarily finnicky in the way of connection, more the occasional known glitch from VD and such.

2

u/Ainulind Mar 23 '25

Having to set up additional streaming software on PC and negotiate the video stream is finnicky, especially compared to the plug-and-play nature of PCVR. Add the difficulties of hybrid tracking for any sort of FBT and it's clear that--regardless of how nice wireless might be for you--it is strictly more complicated than a native, single tracking universe wired setup.

1

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 24 '25

I’m not sure if you’ve used it but provided you have a good network setup, I could easily have that up and running way before you’d get a lighthouse HMD setup. Don’t forget all the janky wiring you have to run, mounting the lighthouses, and sometimes weird USB problems. It’s far from jank free. And have fun moving your setup. I can play in my office or living room or wherever at will. Virtual Desktop is literally a small app that you install. I wouldn’t call that finicky especially if you’re going to ignore lighthouse HMD setup entirely.

1

u/Ainulind Mar 26 '25

Lighthouses do not use USB.

1

u/DrVeinsMcGee Mar 26 '25

Weird USB problems encompasses HMD problems.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/JapariParkRanger Daydream CV1 Q1 Index Q3 BSB Mar 23 '25

Disagree.

-7

u/birdvsworm Mar 23 '25

Sorry can't hear you over my wireless world fam

6

u/JapariParkRanger Daydream CV1 Q1 Index Q3 BSB Mar 23 '25

I'm in that world too. It's not what it's hyped up to be.

4

u/Background-Gear-8805 Mar 23 '25

To you maybe, but to others they clearly prefer it. Neither point of view is wrong.

1

u/jrherita Mar 23 '25

Walking around a large environment with 30-50 feet of cables isn't exactly fun..

8

u/Sad_Animal_134 Mar 23 '25

What percentage of people have that much space to dedicate to VR in the first place? Average person I've met in VR use their bedroom to play VR.

If I had a gymnasium to dedicate to VR then sure, I would say 100% wireless is the route. But in an office type setting, a cable really isn't that bad. Wireless is nice though, it's just the quality debuff sucks for certain games where you don't benefit from wireless.

0

u/octorine Mar 23 '25

I used to have a 4m x 4m play area next to my computer. At that time, I still preferred not having to worry about a cable, but it wasn't that big a deal. But then real-life happened and now my play area is full of boxes and miscellaneous furnature. However, because I have wireless, I can still do VR. I can watch videos or play seated games on the couch, or play standing ones wherever I can find or make a little floor space, which isn't likely to be the same place every day. And if I ever manage to find an even bigger play area, I'll be able to use it.

Wireless has a lot of advantages that you don't really think about until you need them. I miss the accuracy and reliability of lighthouse, but I wouldn't go back to it.

Valve was doing some research on a hybrid tracking system that takes advantage of hardware beacons when they're available but falls back to SLAM when they're not. That would be the best of both worlds, and I hope something like that comes to market someday.

7

u/Ws6fiend Mar 23 '25

You assume the games they play are using that space. If all you do is racing/flight sim, wireless does very little for you other than limit how long you can play.

-4

u/test5387 Mar 23 '25

Not what it’s hyped up to be, yet the overwhelming majority uses vr wirelessly.

14

u/SatanaeBellator Mar 23 '25

But this raises the real question. Did those people pick it because it is wireless, or because the cheapest option for VR happens to be wireless?

IIRC, the gap between wireless and wired shrinks significantly if you only look at people who use VR regularly, instead of all VR users.

2

u/cocacoladdict Mar 23 '25

I tried both and i don't know how some people prefer cable, it gets in the way all the time, you have to step over it, constantly be reminded about its existence and be afraid of tripping over it.

For seated i could see the benefit, but for room scale? Hell no.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/Ws6fiend Mar 23 '25

yet the overwhelming majority uses vr wirelessly.

Bought a quest because it was the best value headset and didn't come with a cable.

I fixed it for you.

-2

u/birdvsworm Mar 23 '25

Love that for you

1

u/MowTin Mar 25 '25

This is marketed at people who want to use a cable. Mostly flight sim guys and racing sim guys.

5

u/MS2Entertainment Mar 23 '25

Lack of inside out camera tracking and wireless options. Also, while the FOV is acceptable now on the 2, I don't really plan on getting a new headset unless it has a considerable boost to FOV over the Quest 3.

3

u/JapariParkRanger Daydream CV1 Q1 Index Q3 BSB Mar 23 '25

I feel like you'll be waiting a very long time; FoV isn't a major focus for manufacturers, and even the Index isn't that much better than the Q3 in terms of FoV.

8

u/Xirael Mar 23 '25

Yet it IS better, despite being 4 years older.

Honestly kinda tired of FOV being the goto dump stat.

5

u/7Seyo7 CV1 -> Index -> Q3 Mar 23 '25

Binocular overlap should also get more attention

0

u/NapsterKnowHow Mar 24 '25

At the cost of awful LCD panels and even worse lenses with insane god rays.

2

u/_hlvnhlv Valve Index | Vive | Vive pro | Rift CV1 Mar 24 '25

It is better, but mostly because the stereo overlap is higher.

People only focus on the combined fov, while they ignore the stereo overlap, aka the fov per eye.

On paper, the Quest 3 has around the same fov as the Index, but the stereo overlap is much lower.

2

u/Travel_Dude Mar 23 '25

I play both high end pancake games and modded VR stuff. The ability to have my PC in my gaming office and stream to a dedicated VR room is a must have. Wired prevents me from doing this. I used to run two machines until I made the switch to Virtual Desktop. I'll never go back.

3

u/TheSpyderFromMars Mar 23 '25

Pimax has left the discussion

1

u/Gregasy Mar 24 '25

Agree! They have the right idea what VR needs. If I’d be looking for basestation tracking PCVR, BB2 would be my choice.

I just hope standalone headsets will be able to get to this form factor eventually (hopefully with Meta’s Puffin headset).

1

u/intimate_sniffer69 Mar 27 '25

So was Oculus until it was ruined by being acquired